<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eyeOS &#8211; Portable Cloud Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/2008/10/02/eyeos-webmail-webcalendar-web-office-portable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/2008/10/02/eyeos-webmail-webcalendar-web-office-portable/</link>
	<description>Keeping your website as dynamic as your business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/2008/10/02/eyeos-webmail-webcalendar-web-office-portable/comment-page-1/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/?p=197#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>Hi Selmak,

eyeOS runs quite happily on a shared server, I have an installation myself. As we&#039;re using more and more software online, word processing, email, Content management, contact relationship management etc. the hard drive software is becoming less important.

Now I do agree that technically it isn&#039;t an operating system, how will you access it without a local filesystem and browser, but it does mean true os&#039;s may not need to be so important. A small solid-state hard disk could be all that&#039;s needed.

A file sync is possible however not out-of-the-box. Using a simple database connection and FTP, something could be integrated quite easily. A web-based java ap could work wonders.

A unix based file system would do more harm than good online, you don&#039;t want files to be accessed by anyone who can guess the directories and filenames in their browser.

Security is definitely an issue, there&#039;s no denying that. If you can access it from anywhere then so can anyone else potentially. Perhaps linking it to a specific MAC address for basic login and ultra secure logins when using from other machines could work.

It doesn&#039;t need to be expensive, and if all your employees are using cloud systems, the physical security problems with a portable laptop on planes, taxis, cars, cafe&#039;s, homes etc becomes less important. The UK government would stop losing our personal data left right and centre on flash disks and so on.

Yes it&#039;s in it&#039;s infancy, but there is potential there to utilise the processing power of the internet as a whole rather than one machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Selmak,</p>
<p>eyeOS runs quite happily on a shared server, I have an installation myself. As we&#8217;re using more and more software online, word processing, email, Content management, contact relationship management etc. the hard drive software is becoming less important.</p>
<p>Now I do agree that technically it isn&#8217;t an operating system, how will you access it without a local filesystem and browser, but it does mean true os&#8217;s may not need to be so important. A small solid-state hard disk could be all that&#8217;s needed.</p>
<p>A file sync is possible however not out-of-the-box. Using a simple database connection and FTP, something could be integrated quite easily. A web-based java ap could work wonders.</p>
<p>A unix based file system would do more harm than good online, you don&#8217;t want files to be accessed by anyone who can guess the directories and filenames in their browser.</p>
<p>Security is definitely an issue, there&#8217;s no denying that. If you can access it from anywhere then so can anyone else potentially. Perhaps linking it to a specific MAC address for basic login and ultra secure logins when using from other machines could work.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t need to be expensive, and if all your employees are using cloud systems, the physical security problems with a portable laptop on planes, taxis, cars, cafe&#8217;s, homes etc becomes less important. The UK government would stop losing our personal data left right and centre on flash disks and so on.</p>
<p>Yes it&#8217;s in it&#8217;s infancy, but there is potential there to utilise the processing power of the internet as a whole rather than one machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selmak</title>
		<link>http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/2008/10/02/eyeos-webmail-webcalendar-web-office-portable/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Selmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zakomedia.com/blog/?p=197#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be as glad as you about eyeOS. You pretend that by the time, PC will become just a platform to connect your eyeOS session. Not sure at all ! eyeOS cannot run on free server because of PHP restriction. Do you really think people will rent a server to install eyeOS? Apps are a big security problem. Using a non-UNIX file system is a wrong way to make eyeOS used by more and more people. You cannot even sync your files on eyeOS. So what? I have a server that a rent expensive. I would like to use eyeOS and sync all my files. I have more than 20&#039;000 files. Am I going to upload them one by one? I don&#039;t say eyeOS is a bad idea. The code is clear, the soft is user friendly and functioning. But it style have to be worked on. I don&#039;t seriously think that those kind we cannot even called Operating System (because of missing kernel) will be one day the future of computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be as glad as you about eyeOS. You pretend that by the time, PC will become just a platform to connect your eyeOS session. Not sure at all ! eyeOS cannot run on free server because of PHP restriction. Do you really think people will rent a server to install eyeOS? Apps are a big security problem. Using a non-UNIX file system is a wrong way to make eyeOS used by more and more people. You cannot even sync your files on eyeOS. So what? I have a server that a rent expensive. I would like to use eyeOS and sync all my files. I have more than 20&#8242;000 files. Am I going to upload them one by one? I don&#8217;t say eyeOS is a bad idea. The code is clear, the soft is user friendly and functioning. But it style have to be worked on. I don&#8217;t seriously think that those kind we cannot even called Operating System (because of missing kernel) will be one day the future of computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.512 seconds -->
